Wednesday, 30 May 2012
The structure of the bridge is highly significant to the meaning. The structure is an adaptation of an arch bridge. Each side is reliant on the other for support. In this way neither Coke nor Facebook are represented any higher than each other. The COke side of the bridge consists of a large and bulky support, with a cable stay structure holding up the road. Although the long support would not be needed as the bridge can be supported adequately by the slight arch and cables, the excessive amount of materials is a reflection of power. The bridge makes a statement on the influence that these companies have, even in a national park environment. (similar to Coca Cola's influence on rubbish disposal at the grand Canyon national park - need article for Mash-up).
The side on which the Facebook studio is placed is simple in appearance however like Coke its supports significantly affect its surrounding environment. The simple appearance, like the studio hides the complex, internal structural mechanisms.
Facebook and Coke studio, meeting place
I have chosen a simplistic exterior for the Facebook studio to reflect the clean cut appearance of the brand. When the facade is rotated however, the interior shows a network of connecting staircases and work spaces. In contrast the interior is busy and occupied to reflect the complex inner workings of the Facebook product, that the public do not see. The interconnecting staircases reflect the aims and functions of the Facebook site, that is to connect a variety of people who would otherwise communicate less. The rotating sides allow the interior to be viewed externally. The nature of the two pieces creates a combination of absolute privacy and openness.
Coke's form of power lies in delivering an experience, while the actual product is unchanged and quite simple in comparison. The studio space is the elevator so that when the users are working, they gain a changing experience without moving themselves. The tiered spaces reflects the rigid hierarchy that would exist in a corporation like Coke. The series of spaces offers different views of the surrounding national park, to highlight the "experience".
The meeting space displays ideas of equality however has two distinguished sides for Coca Cola and Facebook. The orientation of the table determines which side each of the companies should sit. Although the corporations meet at the table and also halfway on the bridge, each has its own designated side. The vegetation is cleared in this spot, but enough remains to give the meeting place a sense of privacy.
Sunday, 6 May 2012
Saturday, 5 May 2012
Architectural concepts
Kisho Kurokawa:
In the following axonometrics, I have used the
following ideas for inspiration: dynamic architecture; symbiosis and abstract
symbolism. Dynamic architecture explores how architecture can be flexible,
interchangeable, reversible and extendible based on the functions or
requirements of a space (seen specifically through the Nakagin Capsule Tower).
Symbiosis explores the relationship between the inside and outside of a
building. Kurokawa considers how one can directly influence the other and how
to transfer elements between them. Kurokawa also explores the idea of abstract
symbolism and how specific shapes have specific universal meaning, which does
not stem from belief.
Steven Holl:
In the following axonometrics, I have used
the following ideas of Steven Holl’s to base them off: phenomenology, porosity
and hinged spaces. Phenomenology explores how the experience of walking through
architecture changes as you move through it. That is, every part of a space has
a different experience depending on where you stand. As the observer pass
through a room, the architecture reveals itself to them. Porosity is explored
by Steven Holl, as a way of breaking down a solid mass. Especially light and
movement illustrate the idea of porosity. Hinged spaces explore how a space can
be flexible based on function (similar to metabolist idea of dynamic
architecture).
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
Combination axonometrics
Porous and abtract symbolism
This model has effectively shared common block to unify the
two ideas while creating a single cohesive monument. The positioning of these
blocks has created another space which acts as a middle ground that bridges the
gap between the two ideas.. Kisho Kurokawa’s abstract symbolism has been
slightly altered so that the two monuments could share a common block. In this
arrangement the model reflects its core ideas of variations of symbols, and
enforces it in the middle space through which all its features can be viewed.
Steven Holl’s porous structure remains contained however the junction between the
two monuments enforces its core idea of penetration and negative spaces. Again
the negative space between the two monuments allows the viewer transitional
space so that the two monuments can be studied separately and together.
Dynamic architecture and phenomenology
This combination allows both architects’ ideas to be
apparent while combining effectively to form a single monument. Kisho
Kurokawa’s dynamic architecture has been flipped and scaled to reflect its
ability to move based on its required function. Steven Holl’s phenomenology has
been positioned so that it shares a wall (block) thus creating new ideas that
change as the viewer passes through the monument.
Flexibility of space and symbiosis
This combination of blocks coherently works together while
still enabling a viewer to comprehend their individual ideas. Kisho Kurokawa’s
idea of symbiosis is still reflected in this arrangement. Steven Holl’s
flexibility of space acts as a “hinge door” at the entrance to Kisho Kurokawa’s
symbiosis. This enforces the idea of flexibility and the ability of
architecture to move with required function. The more defined entrance now
created by Steven Holl’s flexibility of space further enforces the ideas of in
and out in the larger sense of symbiosis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)