Combination axonometrics
Porous and abtract symbolism
This model has effectively shared common block to unify the
two ideas while creating a single cohesive monument. The positioning of these
blocks has created another space which acts as a middle ground that bridges the
gap between the two ideas.. Kisho Kurokawa’s abstract symbolism has been
slightly altered so that the two monuments could share a common block. In this
arrangement the model reflects its core ideas of variations of symbols, and
enforces it in the middle space through which all its features can be viewed.
Steven Holl’s porous structure remains contained however the junction between the
two monuments enforces its core idea of penetration and negative spaces. Again
the negative space between the two monuments allows the viewer transitional
space so that the two monuments can be studied separately and together.
Dynamic architecture and phenomenology
This combination allows both architects’ ideas to be
apparent while combining effectively to form a single monument. Kisho
Kurokawa’s dynamic architecture has been flipped and scaled to reflect its
ability to move based on its required function. Steven Holl’s phenomenology has
been positioned so that it shares a wall (block) thus creating new ideas that
change as the viewer passes through the monument.
Flexibility of space and symbiosis
This combination of blocks coherently works together while
still enabling a viewer to comprehend their individual ideas. Kisho Kurokawa’s
idea of symbiosis is still reflected in this arrangement. Steven Holl’s
flexibility of space acts as a “hinge door” at the entrance to Kisho Kurokawa’s
symbiosis. This enforces the idea of flexibility and the ability of
architecture to move with required function. The more defined entrance now
created by Steven Holl’s flexibility of space further enforces the ideas of in
and out in the larger sense of symbiosis.
No comments:
Post a Comment